Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Legal Checklist for Buying a Business

Buying a business can be an exciting opportunity. It can also create significant risk if the right due diligence is not done upfront.

Many buyers focus heavily on the financial side of the deal. While financial performance is important, legal structure, contracts, liabilities, and operational issues matter just as much.

A well-structured acquisition is not just about buying a business. It is about understanding exactly what you are buying and what risks may come with it.

Below is a practical legal checklist for business owners considering an acquisition.

1. Understand What You Are Actually Buying

Not all business acquisitions are structured the same way.

In general, transactions are structured as either: · An asset purchase · A stock or ownership purchase

In an asset purchase, the buyer typically selects specific assets and liabilities. In an ownership purchase, the buyer steps into ownership of the existing entity itself.

The structure impacts: · Liability exposure · Contracts and licenses · Taxes and operational continuity

Understanding the difference early is important.

2. Review Organizational Documents

You should confirm the business is properly formed and legally operating.

This may include reviewing: · Articles of incorporation or organization · Operating agreements or shareholder agreements · Ownership records · Meeting minutes or governance documents

You want to verify who owns the business and whether there are any restrictions or issues that could impact the transaction.

3. Analyze Existing Contracts

Contracts are often one of the most valuable assets of a business. They can also create hidden obligations.

Review: · Customer agreements · Vendor contracts · Leases · Loan documents · Employment agreements

Pay close attention to: · Automatic renewals · Assignment restrictions · Personal guarantees · Change of control provisions

Some contracts may require approval before they can transfer to a new owner.

4. Evaluate Employees and Key Personnel

A business acquisition is not just about assets. It is often about people.

You should understand: · Who the key employees are · Existing compensation structures · Employment agreements or restrictive covenants · Potential retention concerns after closing

If relationships or operational knowledge are concentrated with a few individuals, that creates additional risk.

5. Review Financial and Tax Matters

Legal and financial diligence should work together.

This includes reviewing: · Financial statements · Tax filings · Existing debt obligations · Outstanding liabilities

You also want to understand whether there are unpaid taxes, unresolved obligations, or financial commitments that could become your responsibility after closing.

6. Identify Regulatory and Compliance Issues

Every industry has different compliance requirements.

Depending on the business, this may involve: · Licenses and permits · Industry certifications · Regulatory filings · Data privacy or employment compliance

If compliance issues exist, you want to identify them before the transaction closes, not after.

7. Understand Potential Liability Exposure

One of the most important parts of diligence is identifying risk.

This may include: · Pending disputes or claims · Warranty obligations · Contractual liabilities · Environmental or operational exposure

Even strong businesses can carry hidden risk if diligence is rushed or incomplete.

8. Clarify What Happens After Closing

The transition plan matters more than many buyers expect.

You should define: · Whether the seller will remain involved temporarily · How customer and vendor relationships will transition · What training or support will be provided · How working capital and operational issues will be handled

Clear expectations help create a smoother transition and reduce disruption after closing.

9. Document the Deal Properly

The purchase agreement is the framework that governs the transaction.

It should clearly address: · What is being purchased · Purchase price and payment terms · Representations and warranties · Indemnification obligations · Closing conditions

The goal is not just to close the deal. It is to clearly allocate expectations and risk between the parties.

A Practical Takeaway

Buying a business can accelerate growth, expand capabilities, and create significant opportunity. But every acquisition carries risk.

Strong diligence helps you: · Understand what you are buying · Identify potential issues early · Structure the transaction appropriately · Move forward with confidence

The businesses that create the most problems are often the ones where diligence was rushed because everyone was eager to get the deal done.

When to Involve a Lawyer

If you are: · Considering acquiring a business · Negotiating terms of a transaction · Unsure how the deal should be structured

…it is worth involving legal counsel early in the process.

At Novel Law, we work with business owners to structure acquisitions in a practical and strategic way, helping clients understand risk, navigate negotiations, and move transactions forward efficiently.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

How to Structure a Business Partnership the Right Way

Starting or growing a business with a partner can be one of the most rewarding decisions you make. It can also be one of the most challenging if expectations are not clearly defined from the beginning.

Most partnership issues do not come from bad intentions. They come from assumptions that were never discussed or documented.

A well-structured partnership creates alignment, clarity, and a framework for making decisions as the business evolves.

Below is a practical guide to structuring a business partnership the right way.

1. Align on Vision and Goals

Before getting into legal documents, start with alignment.

You should clearly discuss: · What each partner wants from the business · Short term and long term goals · Risk tolerance and growth expectations

If partners are not aligned here, problems tend to show up later in more complicated ways.

2. Define Ownership and Equity

Ownership is not just about percentages. It reflects value, contribution, and expectations.

You should clearly define: · Who owns what percentage of the business · How that ownership was determined · Whether ownership can change over time

It is important to think beyond the initial stage and consider how ownership will evolve as the business grows.

3. Establish Roles and Responsibilities

One of the most common sources of friction is unclear roles.

Define: · Who is responsible for which areas of the business · Who has authority to make day to day decisions · Where responsibilities overlap

Clarity here helps avoid duplication, gaps, and tension between partners.

4. Decision Making Structure

Every partnership needs a clear process for making decisions.

This includes: · What decisions can be made independently · What decisions require joint approval · How to handle disagreements

Without a defined structure, even small decisions can slow down the business or create conflict.

5. Compensation and Distributions

Partners often assume this will work itself out. It usually does not.

You should address: · How partners are compensated for their work · How and when profits are distributed · Whether profits are reinvested in the business

Clear expectations around money are essential to maintaining trust.

6. What Happens If Someone Wants Out

No one starts a partnership planning for an exit, but every partnership should define one.

Consider: · What happens if a partner wants to leave · How ownership will be valued · Whether remaining partners have the right to buy the interest

Having this defined upfront avoids difficult negotiations later.

7. Bringing in New Partners

As the business grows, opportunities may arise to bring in new owners.

Define: · Whether new partners can be added · What approval is required · How ownership will be adjusted

This ensures that existing partners maintain control over the direction of the business.

8. Protecting the Business

Partnership agreements should include provisions that protect the business itself.

This may include: · Confidentiality obligations · Non solicit provisions · Expectations around outside activities

These provisions help protect what the partners are building together.

9. Documenting the Agreement

Even if you have strong alignment, it needs to be documented.

This typically takes the form of: · An operating agreement for an LLC · A shareholder agreement for a corporation

The goal is not to create complexity. It is to capture the decisions you have already made in a way that can guide the business moving forward.

A strong partnership is built on clarity, not assumptions.

Taking the time to define expectations upfront: · Reduces the likelihood of conflict · Creates a framework for growth · Allows partners to focus on building the business

The conversations may feel uncomfortable at times, but they are far easier than addressing issues after they arise.

When to Involve a Lawyer

If you are: · Starting a business with a partner · Formalizing an existing relationship · Unsure how to structure ownership or decision making

…it is worth putting the right structure in place.

At Novel Law, we work with business owners to design partnership structures that are clear, practical, and built to support how the business will actually operate.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Can You Be Personally Liable as a Business Owner?

If you run a business, one of the biggest assumptions is that forming an LLC or corporation protects you personally. In many cases, that is true. But it is not absolute.

We regularly see business owners surprised to learn they can still be personally liable in certain situations. Understanding where that risk exists is critical to protecting what you have built.

Below is a practical breakdown of when personal liability can arise and how to avoid it.

1. The Purpose of an Entity Structure An LLC or corporation is designed to separate your personal assets from your business obligations.

In simple terms: · The business is responsible for its debts and liabilities · Your personal assets are generally protected

But that protection only works if the structure is properly set up and maintained.

2. Personal Guarantees One of the most common ways business owners become personally liable is through a personal guarantee.

This often comes up with: · Bank loans · Equipment financing · Commercial leases

When you sign a personal guarantee, you are agreeing to be personally responsible if the business cannot meet its obligations.

Many business owners sign these without fully realizing the impact. It is important to understand exactly what you are agreeing to before signing.

3. Mixing Personal and Business Finances Another common issue is failing to keep business and personal finances separate.

This includes: · Using personal accounts for business expenses · Paying personal expenses from business accounts · Not maintaining proper financial records

When this happens, it becomes harder to show that the business is truly a separate entity. That can weaken the protection you expect from your structure.

4. Failing to Follow Formalities Even small businesses need to treat their entity as a real, operating business.

This may include: · Maintaining proper records · Documenting major decisions · Keeping ownership and governance clear

If the business is not operated as a separate entity, it creates risk that the structure could be disregarded.

5. Personal Actions and Conduct You can also be personally liable for your own actions, even if you are operating through a business.

Examples include: · Signing something in your personal name instead of the business · Making representations or commitments outside the contract · Engaging in negligent or improper conduct

The business structure does not shield you from your own actions.

6. Piercing the Corporate Veil In certain situations, a court may decide that the business structure should not apply. This is often referred to as piercing the corporate veil.

While this is not common, it can happen when: · The business is not treated as separate from the owner · There is misuse of the entity structure · There is a lack of proper documentation or financial separation

The key takeaway is that the protection is not automatic. It has to be supported by how the business operates.

7. Contracts That Shift Risk to You Some contracts are written in a way that shifts risk directly to the business owner.

This may include: · Broad indemnification obligations · Unlimited liability provisions · Personal obligations embedded in the agreement

These terms are often overlooked but can have significant impact if something goes wrong.

8. Insurance Is Not a Complete Solution Insurance is an important tool, but it does not eliminate all risk.

Policies have: · Coverage limits · Exclusions · Situations where claims may be denied

Relying on insurance alone without understanding your legal exposure can create gaps in protection.

A Practical Takeaway Forming an LLC or corporation is an important first step, but it is not the finish line.

To protect yourself as a business owner, you need to: · Understand when you are taking on personal risk · Maintain clear separation between you and the business · Be intentional about the agreements you sign

The goal is not to eliminate all risk. It is to understand it and manage it appropriately.

When to Involve a Lawyer If you are: · Signing agreements that include personal guarantees · Structuring a new business or ownership model · Unsure how your current setup protects you

…it is worth taking a closer look.

At Novel Law, we work with business owners to help them understand where risk exists and how to structure their business in a way that protects both the company and the individual behind it.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

What Every Business Contract Should Include (Minnesota Guide)

If you run a business, contracts aren’t just paperwork. They’re how you protect your time, your money, and your relationships.

Most issues we see aren’t because business owners intended to do something wrong. They happen because expectations weren’t clearly defined upfront. A well-structured contract eliminates ambiguity and gives both sides confidence moving forward.

Below is a practical breakdown of what every business contract should include and why it matters, especially for Minnesota business owners.

1. Clear Scope of Work

At the core of every contract is a simple question: What is each party actually agreeing to do?

Your agreement should clearly define:

· The services or products being provided

· Deliverables and timelines

· Any assumptions or limitations

Vague language like “ongoing support” or “as needed services” creates room for misalignment. The more specific you are here, the fewer issues you’ll have later.

2. Payment Terms That Match Reality

Cash flow is one of the biggest pressure points for any business. Your contract should support it, not create risk.

Key elements to include:

· Total price or pricing structure

· Payment schedule (upfront, milestone, net terms)

· Late payment terms and penalties

· What happens if work expands beyond the original scope

Many business owners rely on “standard terms” without thinking through how they actually operate. Your contract should reflect how you want to get paid in practice.

3. Defined Roles and Responsibilities

Strong contracts don’t just define what you will do, they define what the other party must do for the relationship to work.

This may include:

· Information or materials they must provide

· Timelines for approvals or feedback

· Points of contact or decision-makers

When responsibilities aren’t clearly assigned, delays and frustration usually follow. This is one of the most overlooked sections, and one of the most valuable.

4. Term and Termination

Every contract should answer two key questions:

· How long does this agreement last?

· How can either party exit?

Include:

· Start and end dates (or ongoing term structure)

· Termination rights (for convenience vs. for cause)

· Notice requirements

· What happens to outstanding payments or work in progress

Without this clarity, ending a relationship can become far more complicated than it should be.

5. Risk Allocation (Limitation of Liability & Indemnification)

This is where contracts shift from operational to strategic.

You should clearly define:

· Limits on liability (how much each party could be responsible for)

· Indemnification obligations (who covers certain risks or claims)

Many business owners overlook this section or accept whatever is presented to them. In reality, this is one of the most important parts of the agreement—it determines who bears the risk if something goes wrong.

6. Ownership of Work and Intellectual Property

If your business creates anything — content, designs, processes, or deliverables — you need to define who owns it.

Clarify:

· What the client owns vs. what you retain

· Whether there is a license or full transfer of ownership

· Any rights to reuse or showcase the work

Without this, you may unintentionally give up more than you intended…or create confusion down the road.

7. Dispute Resolution Framework

While you may never expect a dispute, your contract should still address how one would be handled.

This includes:

· Governing law (Minnesota, for local businesses)

· Venue (where disputes would be resolved)

· Whether mediation or arbitration is required before litigation

Even for businesses that prefer to avoid disputes altogether, this structure provides clarity and leverage.

8. Boilerplate That Actually Matters

The “standard” sections at the end of a contract often get ignored but they still carry weight.

These may include:

· Assignment rights

· Amendment requirements (how changes are made)

· Entire agreement clause

· Notice provisions

While these may seem technical, they help ensure the contract functions as intended if issues arise.

A Practical Takeaway

A good contract isn’t about making things complicated. It’s about making expectations clear.

When done right, a contract:

· Aligns both parties from the beginning

· Reduces back-and-forth and misunderstandings

· Protects your business if something doesn’t go as planned

Most importantly, it allows you to focus on running your business, not managing preventable issues.

When to Involve a Lawyer

Not every contract needs to be built from scratch. But if you’re:

· Entering a new type of relationship

· Taking on meaningful financial risk

· Or signing something you don’t fully understand

…it’s worth having a professional review it.

At Novel Law, we work with business owners to create practical, usable agreements that support how they actually operate, not just what looks good on paper.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

What Should Be Included in a Mutual NDA?

Before a partnership conversation, a vendor demo, or a funding discussion — someone will almost certainly produce an NDA. In commercial and startup contexts, that's often a mutual NDA, meaning both sides agree to protect each other's information. The question is: what actually needs to be in it?

This guide walks through the essential terms, what to watch for when reviewing a counterparty's draft, and when it's worth getting a lawyer involved rather than relying on a template.

Mutual vs. One-Way: A Quick Distinction

A one-way (unilateral) NDA protects only one party's information. A mutual NDA creates confidentiality obligations in both directions — each party is simultaneously disclosing and receiving confidential information. Mutual NDAs are standard in startup partnerships, commercial negotiations, vendor relationships, and any context where both sides have material information to protect.

If you're sharing something valuable and you've been asked to sign a one-way NDA, it's entirely reasonable to request mutuality.

The Eight Clauses That Matter Most

1. Definition of Confidential Information

The most consequential clause in any NDA. A well-drafted definition is broad enough to capture what's actually being shared — including oral disclosures, prototypes, and know-how — without being so vague it's unenforceable. Pay close attention to carve-outs: information that the recipient claims is "already known" or "independently developed" should be subject to the burden of proof.

2. Obligations of the Receiving Party

This clause defines what the recipient must and must not do with your information: maintain confidentiality, use it solely for the agreed purpose, restrict internal access to those who genuinely need to know, and implement appropriate security measures.

3. Permitted Purpose

Defines precisely why information is being shared. This clause should be narrow and specific. An NDA without a clearly defined purpose can become an inadvertent licence for the other party to use your confidential information in ways you never contemplated.

4. Standard Exclusions

These carve-outs are reasonable and you should expect them: information already in the public domain, information the recipient can show it independently developed, and information received from a third party without restriction. The key is that these exclusions should be narrow, and the evidential burden should sit with the recipient.

5. Term and Survival

Two timeframes to negotiate: the disclosure period (how long the agreement governs new disclosures) and the survival period (how long confidentiality obligations persist after the agreement ends). Two to five years is typical for commercial information; trade secrets may warrant longer or indefinite protection.

6. Return or Destruction of Materials

If the relationship doesn't proceed, what happens to your information? The NDA should require the return or certified destruction of all confidential materials within a defined period, with confirmation in writing.

7. Injunctive Relief

Damages alone are rarely adequate for a confidentiality breach — the harm is often difficult to quantify and some disclosures cannot be undone. This clause confirms that the disclosing party may seek injunctive or other equitable relief to prevent or stop a breach, without needing to prove financial loss.

8. Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Which jurisdiction's law applies and where disputes will be resolved. For cross-border relationships, this choice has significant practical consequences. Select a jurisdiction where you can realistically enforce your rights.

Startup-Specific Considerations

Investor conversations: Most professional investors will decline to sign an NDA at early pitch stages — this is industry standard and pushing for one can work against you. Once due diligence begins, however, a mutual NDA covering financials, technical architecture, and customer data is appropriate and expected.

Co-founder and early hire discussions: Preliminary conversations with potential co-founders or senior early hires often involve sharing your core concept, technology, and commercial strategy. A mutual NDA is sensible protection, particularly where the other party has adjacent expertise that could make them a competitor.

Technology and IP-intensive businesses: If your competitive advantage is a product, algorithm, dataset, or proprietary methodology, the definition of confidential information requires careful drafting. Make sure it covers source code, technical documentation, internal processes, and know-how — not just formal registered IP.

Broad non-use clauses in counterparty NDAs: This is the risk most startups underestimate. If a larger company sends you an NDA with an expansively drafted non-use clause, you may inadvertently restrict your own product development. Read these clauses carefully before signing.

Commercial Use Cases

In vendor, supplier, or distribution relationships, mutual NDAs sit at the foundation of the broader commercial arrangement. Several additional considerations apply:

  • Data and regulatory compliance: If the relationship involves personal data or regulated information, the NDA must work alongside — not substitute for — appropriate data processing agreements. Understand which legal instrument governs which obligations.

  • Permitted disclosures: Commercial parties often need to share information with advisers, lenders, or regulators. The NDA should accommodate these disclosures provided the recipients are bound by equivalent confidentiality obligations.

  • Cumulative NDA obligations: If you're in simultaneous discussions with multiple parties in the same sector, audit the cumulative effect of your NDA obligations. Overlapping non-use clauses can create unintended restrictions on your commercial freedom.

Template NDA or Draft From Scratch?

ScenarioApproachLow-stakes early conversationA well-reviewed standard template is usually proportionate.Sharing valuable IP or trade secretsBespoke drafting. The definition of confidential information must be precise.Counterparty has sent their own NDALegal review before signing. Standard-looking documents often contain one-sided provisions.Cross-border transactionLocal law advice is essential — enforceability varies significantly.NDA as precursor to a larger dealDraft with the full transaction in mind. Misaligned definitions cause problems downstream.

Red Flags in Any NDA

  • No defined permitted purpose

  • Non-compete or non-solicit provisions buried in the confidentiality clause

  • Indefinite obligations on general commercial information

  • No injunctive relief provision

  • Unilateral amendment rights

  • No return or destruction obligation on termination

  • Confidentiality exceptions drafted so broadly they swallow the rule

Novel Law NDA Services

Novel Law offers focused NDA drafting and review for startups and commercial businesses. Whether you need a clean mutual NDA drafted from scratch, a marked-up review of a counterparty's document, or support through negotiation, we provide commercially-minded advice without the overhead of a large firm.

Services include: mutual NDA drafting · counterparty NDA review · template review and redlines · negotiation support · startup confidentiality frameworks · cross-border NDA advice

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Trademark Enforcement in Focus: Lessons from Lululemon v. Costco

In June 2025, Lululemon initiated a federal lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging multiple counts of trademark infringement related to Costco’s private-label apparel offerings. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, offers a timely and instructive reminder of the breadth and importance of trademark rights. This is particularly relevant with respect to product naming, marketing language, and brand architecture.

Although the dispute arises from the fashion and retail sectors, the legal principles it highlights apply broadly across industries.

The Allegations

Lululemon’s complaint asserts that Costco has infringed upon its registered and common law trademark rights by selling apparel products that allegedly create confusion among consumers regarding their origin or affiliation.

In June 2025, Lululemon initiated a federal lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging multiple counts of trademark infringement related to Costco’s private-label apparel offerings. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, offers a timely and instructive reminder of the breadth and importance of trademark rights. This is particularly relevant with respect to product naming, marketing language, and brand architecture.

Although the dispute arises from the fashion and retail sectors, the legal principles it highlights apply broadly across industries.

The Allegations

Lululemon’s complaint asserts that Costco has infringed upon its registered and common law trademark rights by selling apparel products that allegedly create confusion among consumers regarding their origin or affiliation. Specifically, Lululemon takes issue with Costco’s use of:

  • The SCUBA® trademark (U.S. Reg. No. 4,333,759), associated with Lululemon’s popular line of hooded sweatshirts

  • The product designations DEFINE® and ABC, which Lululemon asserts function as source-identifying marks

  • The color name Tidewater Teal, which Lululemon claims has acquired distinctiveness through extensive use and consumer recognition

Lululemon alleges that Costco marketed and sold several apparel items under names and designs that are likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception among consumers. These actions are claimed to violate the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125), as well as related California state laws.

The complaint seeks injunctive relief, monetary damages, attorneys’ fees, and an accounting of profits derived from the allegedly infringing conduct.

Key Trademark Principles at Issue

This case involves several fundamental concepts in trademark law. Each carries important implications for brand owners and retailers.

1. Trademark Rights Extend Beyond Logos

While visual logos are the most commonly recognized form of trademark, protection also applies to names, phrases, stylizations, and in some cases, product color descriptors. Lululemon’s claim involving “Tidewater Teal” demonstrates how non-traditional brand elements can acquire trademark significance through consistent and exclusive use.

2. Descriptive Terms May Become Protectable Through Secondary Meaning

Words or phrases that may initially appear descriptive or generic can become legally protectable trademarks if they acquire secondary meaning. This occurs when consumers come to associate the term with a specific source. Lululemon contends that terms such as “SCUBA” and “Tidewater Teal” have developed secondary meaning through widespread use, media exposure, and market performance.

3. Trademark Infringement Does Not Require Intentional Copying

A defendant may be liable for trademark infringement based solely on the likelihood of consumer confusion. Intent to infringe is not a necessary element. Even where use is unintentional or based on independent development, liability may still attach if the similarity between marks misleads consumers.

4. Private-Label and In-House Brands Must Adhere to Trademark Standards

Costco’s role as a major retailer and private-label operator does not shield it from trademark liability. Retailers and manufacturers developing store brands must ensure that product names, identifiers, and marketing materials are clearly distinguishable from those of other established brands.

Practical Implications for Brand Owners and Retailers

The Lululemon v. Costco matter highlights several best practices for managing and protecting trademark assets.

Register All Key Brand Elements
Companies should proactively register product names, sub-brands, slogans, and other identifiers that play a role in brand recognition. Federal registration provides important legal presumptions and facilitates enforcement.

Monitor for Potential Infringement
Routine monitoring of the marketplace and competitors is essential to identify unauthorized use of similar marks. Early detection allows for prompt enforcement, which can help maintain the strength of the brand.

Evaluate Naming Conventions for New Products
Before launching new offerings or entering into private-label agreements, companies should assess the distinctiveness and clearance status of proposed brand names and designations.

Preserve and Document Use
To support claims of secondary meaning or common law rights, businesses should maintain thorough documentation of their use of brand identifiers, including advertising materials, sales data, media mentions, and customer engagement.

Train Marketing and Product Teams on Trademark Awareness
Cross-functional coordination between legal, marketing, and product teams helps ensure that brand strategy aligns with trademark protection goals and mitigates the risk of accidental infringement.

Conclusion

The Lululemon v. Costco litigation illustrates a sophisticated and assertive approach to trademark enforcement. It reinforces the idea that trademarks include far more than logos and that even color names and product lines can serve as protected identifiers of source. More broadly, the case serves as a reminder that trademark protection is a critical component of business risk management and brand strategy.

Companies that treat their trademarks as core business assets and implement systems to register, monitor, and enforce them are far better positioned to protect their market position and avoid costly disputes.

Contact Us

If you have questions regarding the protection or enforcement of your trademarks, or if you are concerned about potential risk exposure from current branding practices, please contact our intellectual property team for a confidential consultation.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Can AI Help with Contracts? An Attorney's Perspective

In today’s fast-paced business environment, cost efficiency and speed are paramount. Business owners, particularly those operating small to medium-sized enterprises, face mounting pressure to streamline operations while managing expenses. Contracts, whether for vendor agreements, employment terms, or mergers, form the backbone of commercial transactions but often come with hefty legal fees. Enter artificial intelligence (AI), a technology promising to revolutionize contract drafting, review, and management. From a cost-cutting standpoint, AI offers tantalizing benefits. But its limitations warrant scrutiny, and users should be well aware of the risks.

In today’s fast-paced business environment, cost efficiency and speed are paramount. Business owners, particularly those operating small to medium-sized enterprises, face mounting pressure to streamline operations while managing expenses. Contracts, whether for vendor agreements, employment terms, or mergers, form the backbone of commercial transactions but often come with hefty legal fees. Enter artificial intelligence (AI), a technology promising to revolutionize contract drafting, review, and management. From a cost-cutting standpoint, AI offers tantalizing benefits. But its limitations warrant scrutiny, and users should be well aware of the risks.

The Promise of AI: Cost Savings and Speed

AI-powered tools, such as contract lifecycle management (CLM) platforms like Ironclad, Kira Systems, and LawGeex, have transformed how businesses approach contracts. These platforms leverage natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning to automate tasks traditionally performed by attorneys, including drafting, clause analysis, and risk assessment. For business owners, the appeal is clear: reduced legal costs and accelerated timelines.

Cost Reduction

Legal fees for contract work can be prohibitive. According to the American Bar Association, small businesses spend an average of $7,000 to $30,000 annually on outside counsel for contract-related matters. AI tools offer a cost-effective alternative. For example, platforms like LawGeex claim to review standard contracts in minutes, identifying problematic clauses at a fraction of the cost of human review, sometimes as low as $100 per contract compared to $500-$1,000 for attorney time. Subscription-based models further democratize access, allowing businesses to manage multiple contracts without engaging counsel for every document.

Speed and Efficiency

Time is money, and AI delivers speed. Drafting a NDA manually might take an attorney two to four hours, while AI tools like Ironclad claim to generate a tailored NDA in under 10 minutes using pre-approved templates. For business owners negotiating deals under tight deadlines, this efficiency can be a game-changer. AI also excels at scale, analyzing thousands of contracts for due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. (A task that once required weeks of associate labor). Kira Systems, for instance, claims to reduce due diligence time by up to 70%.

Empowering Business Owners

Beyond cost and speed, AI empowers non-lawyers to handle routine legal tasks. Tools like Rocket Lawyer and LegalZoom provide user-friendly interfaces for generating basic contracts, enabling entrepreneurs to create legally sound documents without immediate attorney involvement. These platforms use AI to customize templates based on user inputs, ensuring compliance with state-specific regulations. For startups with lean budgets, such tools bridge the gap between legal needs and financial constraints, allowing founders to focus on growth rather than legal overhead.

AI's Legal Nightmares: When Algorithms Go Awry

While AI’s benefits are undeniable, its misuse has led to high-profile blunders, underscoring the need for caution. Attorneys and business owners alike have learned the hard way that AI is not a substitute for human judgment.

Hallucinated Citations Haunt Courtrooms

In a recent case that underscores the growing pitfalls of AI in legal practice, a California judge, Michael Wilner, encountered a brief riddled with fabricated citations, as reported by MIT Technology Review. The attorneys, relying on AI tools like CoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, and Google Gemini, submitted arguments citing nonexistent articles, prompting judicial frustration. When pressed for clarification, the firm doubled down with a new brief containing even more errors, highlighting AI's propensity for "hallucinations"—generating convincing but entirely false information. This incident, part of a broader trend infuriating judges across courtrooms, illustrates a critical flaw: AI lacks the ability to verify the accuracy of its outputs against real-world legal sources, risking case integrity and client outcomes.

Phantom Clauses in the Machine

A chilling revelation from Stanford’s Human-Centered AI Institute further exposes AI’s legal frailties, showing that legal AI models hallucinate in at least one out of every six responses. In a simulated due diligence scenario for a merger, researchers tested leading legal AI tools on contract analysis. The models repeatedly misread critical clauses or fabricated nonexistent provisions, such as imaginary termination rights or liability limits, leading to dangerously inaccurate risk assessments. As detailed in the Stanford HAI study, these errors could spell financial disaster in real-world deals, highlighting AI’s critical blind spot: it cannot reliably decipher complex contractual subtleties without vigilant human oversight.

Ethical Issues in AI-Assisted Advocacy

In a stark reminder of AI’s professional perils, a federal judge in 2025 considered sanctions against attorneys who relied on an AI tool to draft a court filing in a prison conditions case, as reported by ABC News. The AI-generated brief included fabricated case law and inaccurate legal arguments, which the attorneys failed to verify before submission. This oversight drew sharp judicial scrutiny, threatening penalties and reputational damage. The case highlights the ethical imperative under Model Rule 1.1, which mandates that lawyers maintain competence by rigorously validating AI-generated work, lest they jeopardize client trust and judicial integrity.

A Warning for AI-Driven Contracts

The allure of AI in drafting contracts and business documents is undeniable, promising speed and efficiency in a high-stakes world. Yet, these cautionary tales reveal a darker truth: AI’s penchant for inventing phantom clauses, conjuring false citations, and misleading even seasoned professionals can lead to catastrophic consequences. From unenforceable agreements to courtroom sanctions, the risks of relying on AI without meticulous human oversight are stark. Business owners and attorneys alike must heed this warning: AI is a tool, not a substitute for expertise. Failing to scrutinize its outputs can unravel deals, erode trust, and invite legal nightmares that linger long after the algorithms fade.

A Collaborative Approach: AI and Legal Expertise as Partners

AI’s value lies in its ability to complement, not replace, legal expertise. Business owners can leverage AI to reduce costs and accelerate routine tasks, but every AI-generated output, whether a draft contract or risk analysis, must be reviewed by an attorney to ensure compliance, accuracy, and strategic alignment. This collaborative approach delivers efficiency while safeguarding against errors.

Best Practices for Business Owners

To integrate AI effectively with legal oversight, business owners should:

  1. Use AI as a Starting Point: Employ platforms to generate initial drafts of standard contracts (e.g., NDAs, service agreements), but always engage counsel to review and customize these drafts for compliance with local laws.

  2. Combine AI with Attorney Review: Use CLM tools to flag potential issues in contracts, then rely on attorneys to interpret and address these findings, particularly for high-stakes or complex agreements.

  3. Educate Teams on AI’s Role: Train staff to view AI as a tool for efficiency, not a substitute for legal advice, ensuring all AI outputs are escalated to counsel for validation.

  4. Partner with AI-Savvy Firms: Work with law firms that use AI to enhance efficiency while maintaining rigorous oversight, offering cost-effective services backed by expertise.

  5. Understand AI’s Limited Context: Recognize that AI tools typically have not accessed your business’s existing contracts. Without this context, AI cannot ensure new drafts are free of conflicts with prior agreements. Attorneys must review all relevant contracts to identify and resolve potential inconsistencies, ensuring alignment across your contractual obligations.

The Attorney’s Evolving Role

For lawyers, AI is an opportunity to redefine their value. By delegating repetitive tasks to AI, attorneys can focus on strategic counseling, negotiation, and risk mitigation, areas where human judgment is indispensable. Firms that master this integration can deliver high-quality services at lower costs, strengthening client relationships.

Conclusion

AI offers business owners a powerful tool to reduce the cost and time of contract management, from drafting NDAs to conducting due diligence. When paired with legal expertise, AI platforms enable efficiency without sacrificing quality. However, horror stories of unenforceable contracts, missed clauses, and ethical breaches demonstrate the dangers of using AI without attorney oversight. The optimal approach is clear: AI and legal expertise must work in tandem. By leveraging AI for initial tasks and relying on lawyers for review and customization, business owners can achieve cost savings, speed, and confidence in their contracts. In an era of technological disruption, the partnership of AI and human insight remains essential for success. For those tempted to let a “ChatGPT’d” contract loose in the wild, consider Novel Law, a cost-effective beacon of legal expertise that polishes your AI-drafted docs into ironclad agreements.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Minnesota’s New Data Privacy Law: A Corporate Survival Guide from Your Friendly Neighborhood Boutique Firm

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA), effective July 31, 2025, is approaching, and it’s time to prepare. As a boutique law firm dedicated to personalized service with the expertise to protect your interests, we’re here to guide you through this new regulation. This overview will help ensure your organization is ready to comply, avoiding any surprises from the Attorney General’s office.

The Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA), effective July 31, 2025, is approaching, and it’s time to prepare. As a boutique law firm dedicated to personalized service with the expertise to protect your interests, we’re here to guide you through this new regulation. This overview will help ensure your organization is ready to comply, avoiding any surprises from the Attorney General’s office.

Understanding the MCDPA

Signed into law on May 24, 2024, by Governor Tim Walz, the MCDPA positions Minnesota as the 19th state to enact comprehensive data privacy legislation. It establishes clear rules for how businesses must handle Minnesotans’ personal information. Think email addresses, purchase histories, or even those targeted ads that seem to know your hobbies a little too well.

The law applies to businesses that either: (1) process personal data of 100,000 or more Minnesota consumers annually, or (2) derive at least 25% of their revenue from selling data and handle data from 25,000 or more consumers. If your organization fits these criteria, compliance is non-negotiable.

Key Provisions and Implications

The MCDPA empowers consumers with significant rights, including the ability to access, delete, or opt out of the sale of their personal data. Additionally, individuals can challenge automated profiling decisions such as those affecting loan or job applications, if they believe the process was unfair. These rights reflect Minnesota’s commitment to transparency and fairness.

For businesses, even smaller ones, there are responsibilities. While some exemptions exist, most companies cannot sell data without explicit consent. You’ll also need to maintain a detailed inventory of the data you collect and ensure your privacy policies are clear and accessible. Non-compliance risks enforcement actions from the Attorney General, which could lead to penalties.

Why Compliance Matters

Consider this scenario: It’s summer 2025, and a data breach exposes your customers’ information. Without proper safeguards, an MCDPA violation could escalate costs and damage your reputation. The law serves as a reminder to treat personal data with care and accountability.

Fortunately, if your business complies with other state privacy laws, such as those in Colorado or Virginia, you’re likely familiar with many of the MCDPA’s requirements. However, its unique elements, like the profiling provision, require careful attention to ensure full compliance.

Steps to Prepare

Start now to stay ahead. Conduct a thorough data inventory, update your privacy notices, and implement a streamlined process for handling consumer opt-out requests. Adopting a “privacy by design” approach not only ensures compliance but also demonstrates your commitment to protecting customer trust.

Postsecondary institutions have an extended timeline until 2029, providing additional time to align systems and processes. Use this period strategically to build a robust compliance framework.

Our Commitment

The MCDPA underscores Minnesota’s focus on safeguarding consumer data, offering businesses an opportunity to strengthen operations and enhance credibility. At Novel Law, we’re ready to assist you with tailored advice and practical solutions. Contact us to discuss how we can support your compliance efforts, because staying proactive is far better than addressing issues after the fact.

Read More
Josh Bykowski Josh Bykowski

Novel Law: Redefining Corporate Legal Services for the 21st Century SMB

At Novel Law, we believe that every small and medium-sized business (SMB) deserves access to high-quality corporate legal services without the prohibitive costs traditionally associated with them. Our philosophy is simple: democratize legal support to empower businesses to thrive in a competitive, fast-paced world. By leveraging innovative processes, technology, and a client-centric approach, we’re breaking down the cost barrier to provide foundational corporate legal solutions that are accessible, efficient, and tailored to the unique needs of SMBs.

At Novel Law, we believe that every small and medium-sized business (SMB) deserves access to high-quality corporate legal services without the prohibitive costs traditionally associated with them. Our philosophy is simple: democratize legal support to empower businesses to thrive in a competitive, fast-paced world. By leveraging innovative processes, technology, and a client-centric approach, we’re breaking down the cost barrier to provide foundational corporate legal solutions that are accessible, efficient, and tailored to the unique needs of SMBs.

Our Philosophy: Legal Empowerment for All

The legal landscape can be daunting, especially for SMBs that lack the resources of larger corporations. Too often, businesses delay or forego critical legal steps—such as forming entities, drafting contracts, or ensuring compliance—due to high costs or complexity. This creates vulnerabilities that can jeopardize growth or even survival. At Novel Law, we see this as an injustice. Our mission is to level the playing field by offering affordable, transparent, and streamlined legal services that prioritize the foundational needs of businesses.

We embrace a proactive, not reactive approach. Instead of waiting for legal issues to arise, we help clients build a strong legal foundation from the start. For already formed businesses, we dive deep into existing structures, contracts, and compliance frameworks to ensure everything is clean, optimized, and ready for growth. This means identifying and resolving potential liabilities, streamlining operations, and preparing businesses for opportunities like fundraising, partnerships, or expansion. By combining cutting-edge technology with seasoned legal expertise, we reduce overhead and pass those savings directly to our clients.

Our Value Add: Why Clients Choose Novel Law

Clients choose Novel Law because we deliver exceptional value without compromising quality. Here’s what sets us apart:

  • Cost Efficiency Without Sacrifice: We’ve reengineered the traditional law firm model to minimize inefficiencies. By using automation for repetitive tasks and focusing on high-impact legal work, we deliver premium services at a fraction of the cost of traditional firms.

  • Transparency and Simplicity: Legal jargon and opaque pricing can alienate clients. We provide clear, upfront pricing and communicate in plain language, ensuring clients understand every step of the process.

  • Tailored Solutions for SMBs: Unlike one-size-fits-all legal services, we customize our offerings to fit the specific needs of each client. Whether it’s forming an LLC, drafting shareholder agreements, navigating compliance, or auditing an existing business for growth readiness, we focus on what matters most to your business.

  • Client-Centric Service: Our clients aren’t just case files—they’re partners. We take the time to understand their goals, challenges, and industries, offering personalized guidance that aligns with their vision.

  • Speed and Scalability: In the 21st century, businesses move fast. Our streamlined processes ensure quick turnarounds, so clients can focus on growth rather than waiting on legal paperwork.

  • Growth-Ready Audits: For established SMBs, we specialize in diving into existing operations to ensure everything is legally sound. We review contracts, corporate governance, and compliance to eliminate risks, resolve discrepancies, and position the business for seamless growth or investment opportunities.

Our clients appreciate this approach because it allows them to secure their legal foundations—or clean up existing ones—without draining their budgets or diverting focus from their core operations. From startups to established SMBs, we’ve earned trust by delivering results that are both practical and impactful.

Why This Matters for SMBs in the 21st Century

The SMB market is the backbone of the global economy, driving innovation, employment, and community growth. Yet, in today’s dynamic environment, SMBs face unprecedented challenges: rapidly evolving regulations, increased competition, and the need to scale quickly in a digital-first world. Legal missteps—whether it’s a poorly drafted contract, a compliance oversight, an unclear ownership structure, or unresolved issues in an existing business—can derail progress or lead to costly disputes.

At the same time, the traditional legal industry hasn’t kept pace with the needs of modern SMBs. High hourly rates, bloated processes, and a focus on large corporations leave smaller businesses underserved. This gap is where Novel Law steps in. We’re relevant because we address the unique realities of the 21st-century SMB:

  • Affordability Enables Growth: By reducing legal costs, we free up capital for SMBs to invest in product development, marketing, or hiring—key drivers of growth.

  • Agility Matches Market Demands: Our efficient processes align with the fast-paced nature of modern business, ensuring SMBs can act swiftly without legal delays.

  • Compliance in a Complex World: With regulations constantly shifting, we help SMBs stay compliant without needing to navigate complex legal frameworks alone.

  • Empowering Entrepreneurs: Many SMB owners are first-time entrepreneurs. We provide the guidance and confidence they need to build or refine their businesses on a solid legal foundation.

  • Preparing for Scale: For established businesses, our deep-dive audits ensure that all legal aspects are clean and optimized, making them attractive to investors, partners, or acquirers and ready for the next stage of growth.

Join the Novel Law Movement

At Novel Law, we’re not just a law firm—we’re a partner in your success. Our commitment to reducing the cost barrier for corporate legal services is about more than affordability; it’s about empowering SMBs to compete, innovate, and grow in the 21st century. Whether you’re starting fresh or scaling an existing business, we’re here to ensure your legal foundation is rock-solid and ready for what’s next.

Contact Novel Law today to learn how we can support your business’s foundational legal needs or audit your existing operations for growth. Together, let’s build a stronger, more resilient future for your SMB.

Read More